You currently have to create your document, print it on your office printer, collect it, fold it, gather up additional inserts and then stuff an envelope. Not in the office? Pretty common now no problem.
invoices, statements, letters, advertising, direct mail, customer comms etc.) directly from your desktop or laptop computer, no matter where you or your team are located. Hybrid mail (sometimes called print and post) enables you to send physical mail (e.g. Where does Hybrid Mail fit into your CCM strategy?Īdditional Resources What is Hybrid Mail? How much does it cost to implement and are there ongoing costs?
Who uses Hybrid Mail (and is it right for us?)
Printme unable to process the document download#
If you’ve already made your mind up that this solution is for you - download our Hybrid Mail implementation checklist to make sure you’re getting off on the best foot (even if it's not with us).ĭon't fall foul to the often overlooked mistakes. You’ll also be able to calculate how much you could potentially save with a Hybrid Mail system and get a clear understanding of implementation costs and timelines. We’ll be dispelling some of the common misconceptions, covering off the common jargon and exploring the different types of solutions and vendors available to you today in this expanding market. To help you make an informed decision, this guide will cover everything you need to know when considering which solution is best for you - and we’ve been cautious to be as impartial as possible. There are many solutions available to you, including ours but there is a broad variation between them. But don't just take this generated schema as it is once you get the idea you should be able to simplify and/or restructure it.If you’re thinking about using a Hybrid Mail solution, we have designed this guide to arm you with all the information you need to decide which type of solution you require. I suggest you go through it comparing it to your XML to get an idea of how schemas are structured. This can be useful if you want to use the same type multiple times within the document but with a different name for each instance. Note, than you can name a free-standing complexType but not on used in the definition of an element. Or define a type and define an element of that type, e.g. Either define an element and reference it, e.g. There are two ways (at least) of doing this. You would then go on to define the elements "lot", "resources" and "process" as compexTypes, etc.
Printme unable to process the document series#
However, as I noted below, generally a schema consists of a series of element definitions which are then used in other definitions - note, this is very simplistic - rather than a definition of the entire document in one go.įor instance, I generated a sample schema using XMLSpy for your XML. You have three self-referencing type declarations for lot, phase and resource - they look unnecessary.Īll the above just relates to syntax errors in the schema. Your use of is either unnecessary or the wrong element, depending on what you require. You can't use the attribute name in the element. Your schema file is missing the closing tag. xml but something doesn't work, Notepad returns me this error: "Unable to parse schema file, Parsing error at line 32: Element complexContent:The content is not valid Expected is (annotation?,(restriction | extension))".
0 kommentar(er)
